Monday, August 11th 2008, 4:00 AM
Barack Obama has had so much good fortune that it would be an overstatement to talk of his present problems as “tragic.” At the very same time, there is indignant opposition - or curdling unsureness - about what he actually represents and has represented from the very beginning of his long campaign.
At the beginning, even as he repeatedly announced his miscegenetic parentage, Obama most truly represented liberation from the dooming provincialism of that misbegotten thing we call identity politics, which is always so focused on a single group virtually blind to overwhelmingly important things.
Identity politics maintains an inability to comprehend the body politic. In the vision of identity politics, every group and every other thing functions independently of everything else.
That is narcissism of an ultimately self-destructive sort. The national debt, the dangers of selling out to wealthy corporate interests or to unions always ready to cripple us with inordinate entitlements are invisible. So are China and India as well as our eroding ability to compete in a global economy. Though they live in the United States, those are not their problems. Identity politics is independent of our common fate as Americans.
Recently, the writer Matt Bai asked if Barack Obama means the end of black politics and talked with a lot of elected black politicians who seemed ambivalent about him because he does not seem to fit the role of race hero as they define it. He seems to be a man of reconciliation, not confrontation. They seem to want a civil rights leader with a new coat of paint.
Bai wrote of the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s response to Obama’s Father’s Day speech in which he was critical of absent black fathers, saying, “To Jackson, this must have sounded a lot like a presidential candidate polishing his bona fides with white Americans at the expense of black ones - something he himself steadfastly refused to do even during his second presidential run in 1988, when he captured more votes than anyone thought possible.”
I don’t know where Bai was in 1988. But I was on Jackson’s campaign tour for the Midwestern and Southwestern portion. I heard him say that, as President, he could not legislate against poor performance in school or irresponsible sexual conduct. But things change.
We have also seen Obama attacked by John McCain and heckled by black people for the same reasons: that he does not appear to represent or have a special place in his platform for black Americans, even though he is running for President of the United States.
This is a remarkable moment, or perhaps it is not. When the Republicans attack a candidate for not focusing on black Americans, we can only think of that as a ploy. Another black rabble-rouser demanding that Obama be true to “his” community is no more than the latest loudmouth mired in identity politics.
The biggest challenge facing black politicians is moving into the bigger game facing the nation as a whole. This might actually be done by making it clear, as the civil rights movement did, that the troubles and dilemmas of black Americans are only the troubles of the nation in microcosm.
Either our country will remake itself in order to sufficiently live up to the challenge of global competition or it will not. The more time we spend piddling around with identity politics, the better an edge we will give to China and India, neither of which has misread the neon handwriting on the wall.
That handwriting is very clear: Educate your people, especially in math and science, produce high quality products and don’t cry oppression if you have to work hard. That is beyond black politics, beyond color, beyond special interests groups. Reality usually is.
crouch.stanley@ gmail.com
Tags: American Society, Black Americans, Education